Time travelling
Assumption: Time travelling obeys theory of fate.
I.E. The fate of life and all matter are fixed. => If time travelling exists, there exists fate which are time-resistant. I.E. the fate extends to it's recurrance in earlier time of its existance.
=> It is said the entity has two forms co-existing in a single time frame.
Postulate 2.3: Since events are decided and insequential, I.E real, and events are in its stable stead, there cannot exist and shouldnt have existed an entity in which its fate has it destroyed/killed itself in its earlier state. Meaning to say, it never existed before. (Fate had it not to exist)
Postulate 2.1: If time travel is possible, and object exists in both the origin time frame and its intruded time frame, then
For every time travelling event of an entity, a additional image of itself is created on the real time line, specfically on the destination time.
Direct implication from this effect, spontaneous appearance of entity across any real time possible.
Mass is not conserved in a specific plane of time => mass transcends time => there exists an mass conservation equation relating to time. change in total mass in a period of time where time travelling is confined = 0, or initial integral (a b) M = final integral (a b) M, where b and a are frames of time(boundary of the time travelling) on the real time line.
Note: If there is no boundary => integrate from - infinity to infinity.
This further implies that the number of times an entity is able to time travel is limited, i.e by the mass of the entity it is able to replicate from it's surroundings/the total mass in it's system of existence. Additional mass is extracted outside the entity for each travel.
Sum of mass from all frames of time on the real time line is always constant => there exists no entity stuck in a closed destroyed loop. Ie, if entity A returns in time to trigger an event to which destroys/kills it's older self hence causing it not to exist in the frame of origin(ie the time frame where it time travelled from) it is said to never exist in the first place. (Mass is conserved on space time)
Postulate 2.2: If time travelling is possible, and object carries its own body across the real time line, then
if mass is conserved on each frame of time, for every particle of entity from origin frame of time is passed through the planes of time, the same amount of particle is returned to the origin frame from the destination frame.
Direct implication from this effect, spontaneous appearance and disappearance of particles across any real time possible.
if mass is conserved across all frames of time i.e same as 2.1,
"Direct implication from this effect, spontaneous appearance of entity across any real time possible.
Mass is not conserved in a specific plane of time => mass transcends time => there exists an mass conservation equation relating to time. change in total mass in a period of time where time travelling is confined = 0, or initial integral (a b) M = final integral (a b) M, where b and a are frames of time(boundary of the time travelling) on the real time line.
Note: If there is no boundary => integrate from - infinity to infinity.
This further implies that the number of times an entity is able to time travel is limited, i.e by the mass of the entity it is able to replicate from it's surroundings/the total mass in it's system of existence. Additional mass is extracted outside the entity for each travel.
Sum of mass from all frames of time on the real time line is always constant => there exists no entity stuck in a closed destroyed loop. Ie, if entity A returns in time to trigger an event to which destroys/kills it's older self hence causing it not to exist in the frame of origin(ie the time frame where it time travelled from) it is said to never exist in the first place. (Mass is conserved on space time)"
Note: If technology allows, 2.1 and 2.2 may be possible variations of time travelling.
-
ok i did this when i was tired. didnt had time to check or test it.. so its likely to be untrue.